Skip to main content

Governance: Is It Boring? Or Is It Everything?

By November 27, 2017September 12th, 2023No Comments
Woman sitting facing man

In most instances, the lack of consistent and sustainable high-sales performance can be credited to poor Governance. The question for Sales Leaders is “Where are you going to set the performance bar?” and “What are your expectations for your sales organization?”

To create consistent success, you must outline the key metrics for each of your people and the expectations for the tasks they are required to perform to achieve it. These five areas are outcomes that are directly affected by Governance and are key areas of concern:

  • Accurate Sales Forecasting within /- 5%
  • CRM Updates and current status every month
  • Proper Account Planning with Quarterly Reviews
  • 100% Individual Plan Attainment each month or quarter
  • Proactive Innovation and Demand Creation activities within the prospect or account on a monthly or quarterly basis

Governance revolves around setting both the targets and the pace with a desire for excellence. Once you determine your key metrics, such as the five above, you must answer the questions, “Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How.” It is highly recommended that you involve your team in adopting the “rules” of your Governance to create greater buy-in. At the very least, make sure that you have the agreement and support of your top-performing people to ensure they can help you leverage their influence.

As an example, let’s use forecasting. You may choose to create three numbers that are submitted each month. The first number is the best case. This is where the salesperson provides you with an optimistic expectation if everything were to close. The second number is the forecast number. This is a reasonable expectation for closure. The last is commit, which is critical. Commit is the number you can trust the most, which MUST be as close to 100% as possible. Accuracy is an opportunity for reward, while inaccurate assessments provide room for negative consequences. You can further define this with your team to ensure accuracy is attained.

The major issue around proper Governance is establishing consequences for failure to comply. A Governance rule that needs to be followed or has consequences is meaningless. In many high-performing organizations, the Governance metrics are written into the Performance Evaluation or incorporated into the progressive discipline process. A test of your commitment to consequences is how you will handle top performers who fail or refuse to follow your Governance procedures.

Governance is relatively easy to establish. You must set the bar. Enlist your team members to help you so you gain their support. Inspect and provide consequences, both positive and negative, based on compliance. If you are truly interested in creating consistent and sustainable high levels of performance, this is the first area you should address.

Personal Challenge: Create a list of the five most important metrics you want to improve. Examples could be win rate, new targeted client ideas per month, Reps to plan attainment or forecast accuracy. Once you’ve established the metrics, determine how much you would like to improve and when you would like to improve. A suggestion would be to discuss individually with your team “opinion leaders” to gain buy-in and support. You should answer the questions: Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How to ensure a complete plan for each metric.



Leave a Reply

  • Reset